A loss like last week’s loss against Notre Dame can bring
on many feelings of pessimism. It can
make you wonder whether last year’s record of 11-2 was a fluke, whether MSU is
going to collapse this year (especially if the O-line doesn’t come together),
and whether Dantonio can ever get MSU to compete against elite teams. This was supposed to be MSU’s best team,
since…perhaps since the 60s. And as I discussed
in my review of the game a few days ago, they only looked good on defense.
Well, let me provide some
information that can help us develop some perspective, patience, and ultimately
gratitude. You see, when Dantonio was
hired, the first thought that came to my mind was that this guy could win about
8 or 9 games a season and get MSU established as a solid football program. I thought to myself, he’s not going to be Lou
Holtz and come in here and win a national championship, but he could be the Barry
Alvarez of MSU.
Barry Alvarez was, of course,
Wisconsin’s head football coach from 1990 to 2005. As we can see in the table below, he turned
around a program that had been mediocre from 1970 to 1985, and that was a Big
Ten bottom-feeder from 1986 to 1990. Alvarez
never became an “elite” coach; he didn’t win a national championship, and his
record in the Big Ten was barely above .500.
But he was a solid coach that generally won the games he was supposed to
win and he did also manage to win 3 Big Ten titles (1993, 1998, 1999) and go 8-3
in bowl games.
Coach
|
Years
|
Total Record
|
Big Ten Record
|
John Jardine
|
1970–1977
|
37–47–3
|
25–38–1
|
Dave McClain
|
1978–1985
|
46–42–3
|
32–34–3
|
Jim Hilles
|
1986
|
3–9
|
2–6
|
Don Morton
|
1987–1989
|
6–27
|
3–21
|
Barry Alvarez
|
1990–2005
|
118–73–4
|
65–60–3
|
Bret Bielema
|
2006–Present
|
49–16
|
26–13
|
So you could say that Wisconsin
was not “elite” under Alvarez, but perhaps his biggest accomplishment was that
he more than adequately got the program rolling in the right direction, and
then he handed the keys off to a guy who appears capable of taking that next step
towards “eliteness”: Bret Bielema.
Bielema has clearly continued to improve Wisconsin to the point where
they can now be considered a program that can legitimately be expected to compete
for the national championship, almost every year.
So, how does Dantonio compare with
Alvarez? Well, in the table below we can
see that Dantonio has done for MSU what Alvarez did for Wisconsin. Dantonio has taken a mediocre MSU program and
turned it into a consistent program that can challenge for the Big Ten
title. Like Alvarez, however, Dantonio
has not turned MSU into an elite program that can compete with other elite programs,
such as Alabama and Notre Dame (this year’s Notre Dame, which looks to be the
best Notre Dame team in a long time).
Dantonio has also not turned MSU into a deep enough team that can reload
from year to year and that can overcome injuries in certain units (such as the
O-line).
Coach
|
Years
|
Total Record
|
Total %
|
Big Ten Record
|
Big Ten %
|
Clarence Munn
|
1947–1953
|
54–9–2
|
.846
|
5–1
|
.833
|
Duffy Daugherty
|
1954–1972
|
109–69–5
|
.609
|
72–50–3
|
.588
|
Denny Stolz
|
1973–1975
|
19–13–1
|
.591
|
14–9–1
|
.604
|
Darryl Rogers
|
1976–1979
|
24–18–2
|
.568
|
19–12–1
|
.609
|
Muddy Waters
|
1980–1982
|
10–23–0
|
.303
|
8–18–0
|
.308
|
George Perles
|
1983–1994
|
68–67–4
|
.504
|
53–42–2
|
.557
|
Nick Saban
|
1995–1999
|
35–24–1
|
.592
|
23–16–1
|
.589
|
Bobby Williams
|
2000–2002
|
15–17
|
.469
|
6–15
|
.286
|
Morris Watts
|
2002
|
1–2
|
.333
|
1–2
|
.333
|
John L. Smith
|
2003–2006
|
22–26
|
.458
|
12–20
|
.375
|
Mark Dantonio
|
2007–present
|
35–20
|
.636
|
20–12
|
.625
|
On the other hand, Dantonio’s
record is considerably better than Alvarez’s at this point. Dantonio’s total winning percentage is not
overwhelmingly higher (.636 versus .606), but his record in the Big Ten is
considerably higher (.625 versus .508). This
is why I (and many other Spartan fans) tend to get ahead of ourselves. We want to believe that MSU is already where
Wisconsin is under Bielema (.754 total winning percentage and .667 Big Ten winning
percentage). But that’s just not the
case.
The bottom line is that Spartan
football fans have much to look forward to.
“At worst,” Dantonio is another Barry Alvarez, and he is building
something that can be handed off to MSU’s version of Bielema. Then the dilemma will be choosing the right
person to hand the keys off to when the time comes. At best, Dantonio may turn out to be Alvarez
and Bielema all rolled into one. Perhaps
another 3 years and he could bring the program to elite status.
No comments:
Post a Comment